Nessland

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Israel - a possibility?

As per the recent developments on Iranian issue, it is getting very critical that we might see a zoomed in press report by President Bush himself on the regime change in Iran. It is already very obvious that US State Department is in difference with Iran developing their nuclear program. There is no doubt in that and we all know that US is capable of doing so “if Iran continues to pursue its controversial nuclear ambitions”.

Iran maintains that Iran isn’t another Iraq and the greedy superpower should think and calculate twice before bombing. Also, it is highly unlikely that US will be the only major power attacking Iran all by itself because of its involvement in Iraq and semi-involvement in Afghanistan. But regardless of other purposes, one thing for sure is that regime change in Iraq will become much easier if the current regime of Iran is replaced with something else other than the current one.

The question that arises now is that will Israel really strike Iran on behalf of US? As the story goes, an undisclosed number of F-15 bombers and F-16 fighters destroyed the Osirak reactor near Baghdad on the orders of Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel in 1981. Apparently, Iran had learned a lesson there and then and has securely protected, at least what’s claimed, the Natanz uranium-enrichment complex and the conversion plant in Esfahan.

Personally, I believe that there is more danger than not from Israel rather than US for Iran. An Israeli minister has already called for Iran to be expelled from the United Nations after President Ahmadinejad’s persistent calls for Israel to be “wiped off the map”.


“Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihiliation,”
Ahmadinejad said. “The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be
eliminated by one storm,” he said.

Source

Whatever maybe the final deal, it is surely a concern for US embassies, offices, trading companies, and schools around the world as they will fall under a major threat if US ever plans to attack. By studying the current governments’ stances with US, I also see some involvement from Oman, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and possibly Pakistan. I’m curious about Iran’s defense strategy for the possible attacks, if ever executed. We all know that “superpowers” love to spread peace in this world anyway so it isn't a far fetched fantasy that there will be some attacks. Just to set the records straight, I side myself against the preemptive strikes by the way :)

5 Comments:

  • this is a very controversial topic..attacks on Iran could have serious reprucussions for many people. i agree with Russia that the situation should only be dealt with diplomacy rather than with force. it would be beneficial to all parties. this scenarios however depends heavily on the Iran, whether they remain true to their intentions of using their nuclear capability for peaceful purposes.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/26/2006 1:54 PM  

  • Iran is a very developed country whose oil is a major factor in any decision. They've been there for years but they have never done anything agains any outside country, so I personally don't see a threat with the nukes. I don't think there'll be a preemptive strike in Iran.

    By Blogger Random Saudi, at 4/26/2006 10:59 PM  

  • moin - regardless of "whether they remain true to their intentions of using their nuclear capability for peaceful purposes", they deserve to excercise their autonomy rather than being pressurized by other states. That is the first issue to take in consideration.

    random saudi - I don't see much threat either by the Iranian government after acquiring the nukes but interesting that you say there won't be any strikes against Iran. I think that is one of the most serious issue in debate among the top government officials of both US and Israel, to whom President Ahmadinejad keep offending.

    By Blogger feveri, at 4/27/2006 8:15 PM  

  • apart from the fact that the iranian president made comments like "wiping out Israel of the map" i am confident that Iran will act responsibly with the technology. however such comments are harmful and if Ahmadinejad assures that Iran is using the technology for peaceful purposes than he should not be making such controversial comments. thats all. i agree that Iran has the right to excercise their autonomy.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/27/2006 8:59 PM  

  • By Blogger خدمات منزلية 01016261727, at 10/17/2019 1:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home



Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!