The DaVinci Code
Someone please tell me what's all the hype about? I mean it was marketed extensively on all the documentary channels and thru all other means of advertising possible. It was an okay movie. Ending was kinda too fictitious but overall, I would rate it a B+. I caught the very first show and when I came back that night, I witnessed chaos in news about this particular movie. Churches protesting it, tons of religious groups boycotting it, people appealing not to watch it since it 'mocks' Christ's prophethood. Many Islamic groups also boycotting it because Muslims consider Jesus as a Prophet also.
Ahem, how about we try to understand the definition of 'fiction'. It is a fictitious novel with twisted historical facts and presents a factual theory thru logical means for pure entertainment. Is that too hard to understand? Again in other words, it is merely based on assumptions and speculations and it is nothing factual. Yes, there are elements of truth but that doesn't make the whole theory factual from any angle.
For boycotting Christian groups: I can fully understand the anger by Christians about this book/movie. If a similar book is written about Islam and our Prophet, I have no doubt it will create a huge fuss with fatwas of murder and mayhem flying all across the globe being passed on from one 'religious' nation to another. Response by Roman church is noticeably mild, and for a reason. Excesses of Roman churches in the past had resulted in the vigor displayed to protect freedom of speech. And this book is an example of freedom of speech and opinion. Moreover, it is widely agreed that it is a piece of imagination and forwards a theory based on assumptions, which are most likely to be absurd. Please keep that in mind before throwing such trash on a movie.
For boycotting Muslims: First and foremost, since the story is sold as fiction; trying to find parallels from Islamic rulings seem kinda insane. However, from a Muslim stand point, to the best of my knowledge, Quran is silent on whether Jesus ever married or had kids. And one way or the other, it does not impact his Prophetic teachings or status. I, for one, never heard that Jesus was married so I assumed that he never was. Whether he was or not, it does not affect his status at all and when this theory is said to be totally factual by the theorist himself, it stands baseless to be argued upon, in my humble opinion.
For those who are Muslims and still pro-boycotts: Why should Muslims be outraged by this book, other than the blanket reason that no book should be written about any religious figure, which frankly is an absurd argument, IMO. The book does not mock Christ as a Prophet of God, however, it does present an alternative theory that contradicts some of the beliefs added by the Church about Christ. Jesus Christ's prophethood is not questioned in the book, at all.
Whatever it was, the movie opened with second highest hit ever during its first weekend in box office. From a marketer's point of view, hats off to the publicists. They did an amazing job in advertising it and growing the curiosity grow among the audience until the last minute. "It brought in over $77 million domestically and over $230 million worldwide. It is the second biggest worldwide opening of all time, trailing only Star Wars: Episode III from last year which took in over $250 million" even when so many people are claiming to boycott it. Isn't it spectacular?
Ahem, how about we try to understand the definition of 'fiction'. It is a fictitious novel with twisted historical facts and presents a factual theory thru logical means for pure entertainment. Is that too hard to understand? Again in other words, it is merely based on assumptions and speculations and it is nothing factual. Yes, there are elements of truth but that doesn't make the whole theory factual from any angle.
For boycotting Christian groups: I can fully understand the anger by Christians about this book/movie. If a similar book is written about Islam and our Prophet, I have no doubt it will create a huge fuss with fatwas of murder and mayhem flying all across the globe being passed on from one 'religious' nation to another. Response by Roman church is noticeably mild, and for a reason. Excesses of Roman churches in the past had resulted in the vigor displayed to protect freedom of speech. And this book is an example of freedom of speech and opinion. Moreover, it is widely agreed that it is a piece of imagination and forwards a theory based on assumptions, which are most likely to be absurd. Please keep that in mind before throwing such trash on a movie.
For boycotting Muslims: First and foremost, since the story is sold as fiction; trying to find parallels from Islamic rulings seem kinda insane. However, from a Muslim stand point, to the best of my knowledge, Quran is silent on whether Jesus ever married or had kids. And one way or the other, it does not impact his Prophetic teachings or status. I, for one, never heard that Jesus was married so I assumed that he never was. Whether he was or not, it does not affect his status at all and when this theory is said to be totally factual by the theorist himself, it stands baseless to be argued upon, in my humble opinion.
For those who are Muslims and still pro-boycotts: Why should Muslims be outraged by this book, other than the blanket reason that no book should be written about any religious figure, which frankly is an absurd argument, IMO. The book does not mock Christ as a Prophet of God, however, it does present an alternative theory that contradicts some of the beliefs added by the Church about Christ. Jesus Christ's prophethood is not questioned in the book, at all.
Whatever it was, the movie opened with second highest hit ever during its first weekend in box office. From a marketer's point of view, hats off to the publicists. They did an amazing job in advertising it and growing the curiosity grow among the audience until the last minute. "It brought in over $77 million domestically and over $230 million worldwide. It is the second biggest worldwide opening of all time, trailing only Star Wars: Episode III from last year which took in over $250 million" even when so many people are claiming to boycott it. Isn't it spectacular?
5 Comments:
true dude! it is just an another side of story many people have never heard. it is a fictional story and a good idea to sell. roman church did an excellebt job not responding otherwise it would have created a major fuss.
By Anonymous, at 5/29/2006 11:57 AM
You're right. The movie was ok. However, I went and saw it with a couple of Christian friends. Their reaction was quite surprising.
Even if it a work of fiction, imagine your reaction if a 'story' was told that our prophet (es'3furalla) gay or something!!!!!!!!!! We would be upset right?
So the idea behind not encouraging religious figures to be subjects for work of fiction is sensitivity. The fear of corrupting what people think is a weak but valid arguement. I consider myself a moderate conservative, so I prefer that some things remain sacred =)
By SunShine, at 5/29/2006 2:58 PM
the book that the movie is based on is a work of fiction. for any reasonable person, this means that movie contains no reality either. I do not think that the movie or the book questioned Jesus' prophethood but rather his divinity. As a muslim, i had no reservations against watching the movie. However, for Christians it is a totally different deal. For Muslims, the fact that Jesus was married or not has no bearing on his prophethood. i enjoyed the movie but still prefer the book. By the way umair, da vinci had the 4th biggest opening, after spiderman, star wars, and shrek.
By Anonymous, at 5/29/2006 9:59 PM
the olive ream - thanks
desi - agreed
sunshine - i went and saw it with a Christian friend also but he had read the book and he wasn't surprised at all.
I see what you're saying. I kinda agree with your thought that religious figures should not be part of such fantasies but that isn't the point I was raising. Main thing was how to respond to it. Yes, I second your opinion on religious figures should not be used in people's fantasies.
moin syed - I, also, liked the book way better than the movie. I confirmed it on CNN that it was the second biggest weekend opening ever after Star Wars internationally and domestically combined. That's what the link says in my post too. Anyway, whatever it was, it was surely advertised brilliantly.
By feveri, at 5/30/2006 4:51 AM
Assalamno alaykum w.w.!
yeah, i really dont know whats the fuss about .. where's the freedom of expression ... any how ... the movie's just not worth teh original novel ... i got hands on the movie after quite many rounds of shops ... and it was not worth that i know :)
By Anonymous, at 7/12/2006 5:05 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home